Bronx+Science+EM+v.+Appleton+West+KS+-+Blake+Round+6

Bronx Science EM v Appleton West KS

I think this is probably the wrong 2NR strategy. Additionally I think that the 2NR is conceding some offensive parts on the other topicality debates that cost you a lot of ground on the impact debate on topicality. I do not buy that these are new 1AR arguments but rather just answers to the new impact calc in the 1NR. I think that there are some major offense for the aff that is going conceded by the negative. I think that the reasonability debate is SERIOUSLY mishandled by the negative and the 2AR exploits this.

__RFD:__ I think that the aff’s interpretation can solve all of the offense on the flow and in addition to that has external offense to make their interpretation more preferable.