Henry+W.+Grady+BC+v.+Chattahoochee+WR+-+Carrollton+Quarters

Grady BC v. Chattahoochee WR

I think that the affirmative is not taking the Coercion flow seriously enough from the get go. I think that the 2NC essentially does enough to win the neg this debate. I think the only problem is that Petro extensions. The 1NC never read the Petro evidence. I think even without Petro, they still get their analysis and the framework. The aff concedes the rights framework and I think that the 2AR hege analysis is brand new in the framework. I vote neg evaluating the rights first. I must reject the instances of rights. The Coercion impact outweighs on probability – that’s the first card Matt reads in the 2NC. It did not help the affirmative that most of their speeches were incomprehensible. I don’t think the segregation analysis defeats the link enough for me to vote aff.