Marist+CR+v.+Perry+LM+-+Ohio+Valley+Round+1

I am not sure how strategic it is to be reading patriarchy with a soft power advantage. I think the two positions are rather contradictory. I think that garnering some type of advantage off the ruling is better for the aff. This can function as offense against counterplans rather than reading generic advantages that any advantage CP can solve.

The 2ac functionally concedes EVERY net benefit to the counterplan. Additionally, the only real answer to the counterplan is a solvency deficit. The 2NC analysis is pretty spot on and he really doesn't have to do much here and on the net benefits but he does great impact analysis and i think that after the 2AC

The 2nr really has two options in the round, T or the cp/case debate. I think the easier way to go is the cp/case especially when the 1ar continues to conceed all the turns.

2nr instead takes too much, I think that this can hurt in other rounds. This round, it didn't matter- you didn't get to solvency with as much time as you should.

I vote neg - the disad outweighs and turns case.