Alpharetta+PR+v.+Chattahoochee+BC+-+JV+State+Finals

I vote affirmative in this round - I don't think the negative is actually impacting Topicality in the 2NR. I literally think potential abuse is the only voter in the 2NR that's explained. I think the 2AR needs to focus on the 1AR arguments - I think the extrapolation on the effects debate is probably too much. I think that the negative meets the standards of the definition to create a net increase - the 1AR is pretty good at the top of the debate on the interp debate. The potential abuse not a voter probably needs to be newer in the debate than just in the 2AR.

I think that the negative makes the right 2NR decision - the only other potential option is politics + case - which would also be tough to win.