Brookwood+SB+v.+Piedmont+SW+-+Stratford+Finals

RFD: The affirmative is conceding too much of almost every flow. But at the same time I think the 2NR is functionally not giving enough analysis in a lot of areas on the debate.

On the counterplan debate, i think that the permutation probably can't solve and definitely links to the net benefits. The only other real thing for the affirmative is the education disad. I think that the aff may be ahead on this part of the flow but I think that the problem is the conceded spending disad. I think both of these arguments are really muddled and really just solve for each other.

I think the politics debate is where there is a problem - and thats because the negative is far ahead. The aff needs to do more analysis on the impact turn debate. I think the CP solves the aff and politics outweighs.