Bloomington+LZ+v.+Littleton+JM+-+Blake+Round+3

1AC – Childcare Services 1NC – T-Social Worker, SKFTA, Military Tradeoff, State Courts, case 2NC – Military Tradeoff, case 1NR – Biopower, case 2NR – Military Tradeoff, case   The framework debate: I do not think that Bok evidence actually is that great – I think the evidence says that extinction is an a priori concern not necessarily the nuclear war. I think that the negative is farther ahead on this issue though- this means that the nuclear war issue comes first.  I think the negative is winning the uniqueness on the disad and the 1AR and 2AR are conceding the disad turns case args and I think that the disad turns case.  RFD: I vote negative in this round on the politics disad outweighing and turning the affirmative. I think that the negative is winning that nuclear war comes first and clearly winning the disad debate. I don’t think the 1AR/2AR is not doing enough on the securitization debate for me to pull the trigger. Additionally most of the 2AR analysis on impacts is BRAND NEW. I think this is where I can feel reall good about pulling the trigger for the negative.