Edina+DM+v.+Highland+Park+KW+-+Blake+Round+5

I vote affirmative in this round - the affirmative outweighs under the util framework.

I think the 2AR makes a gutsy call in conceding the util debate - I think you can avoid conceding the util debate and still take advantage of the conceded turns on the dropped CP. I think the 2AR should probably be focusing on making more arguments and not putting all of your eggs into one basket. The problem in this round is that the negative has some pretty big concessions. I think that by going for util and the K - the negative is really not putting themselves ahead in the debate. I think the aff's impacts outweigh the K especially under the framework