Mountain+Brook+JQ+vs.+Warner+Robins+NR+-+Samford+Round+4

1AC - There are better racism cards than Barndt- especially for moral obligation. Don't default to old crappy evidence.
==1NC – You probably shouldn’t be reading three spending-based disadvantages. You are giving the aff to much of the same ground to cover in his 2ac. I think that you are better off if you some type of CP to solve the affirmative or even a K of immigration or detention.==

==2AC – I’m loving paperless as of your speech. There really isn’t anything wrong with the speech – I’d recommend some type of spending-based add on… like a ICE tradeoff good. That’s what I expected on the flows- especially after you read the card that says we use ICE money. You need some new HC ev on the aff- your ev doesn’t assume the SCF passage.==

2NC – You really need to be answering the line by line – without answering Kevin’s specific args you are giving yourself no way to win this round.
==1NR – Answering arguments really does help. Just extending your answers doesn’t really get you anything else. Look into the Georgetown Camp’s Defense Spending file. They have some pretty good sample blocks on how to prepare this disadvantage. Using Georgetown as a model, you can create blocks for all of your disads to help you better your answers on the 2AC arguments. There really needs to be some type of link analysis in the block other than just the 1NC stories. The negative block can be used to out-tool the other team. Use the 13 minutes to your advantage.== ==1AR – Besides your politics being outdated, the 1ar was fine. You need to be flowing the 2NR though. I assume you do in rounds where you’re not this far ahead, but still… you need to do some type of work just in case your 2AR misses something.== ==2NR – When you take the disad in the 2NR, you need to be doing some type of impact analysis – specifically the COMPARISON of the impacts. You say it outweighs the aff, but WHY? There is no articulated reason why economic collapse outweighs their Shattuck evidence or their China scenario. Again answering arguments good.==